DAC 2009 - Revision history

Rtwomey: /* semantic gaussian blur */

2009-08-04T16:04:50Z

‎semantic gaussian blur

2009-08-04T16:04:40Z

‎semantic gaussian blur

2009-08-04T16:04:19Z

‎semantic gaussian blur

2009-08-04T15:57:58Z

‎Outline

2009-08-03T16:35:53Z

DAC 20009 moved to DAC 2009: naming error!

2009-08-03T16:34:21Z

‎Abstract

2009-08-03T16:31:37Z

‎Outline

2009-08-03T16:23:00Z

‎Outline

2009-08-03T16:11:37Z

2009-08-03T16:11:22Z

@@ Line 67: / Line 67: @@
 === semantic gaussian blur ===
 * nearest neighbor replacement
-* analagous to associative free-
+* analagous to associative free-thinking
 === Concerns with my approaches ===

@@ Line 67: / Line 67: @@
 === semantic gaussian blur ===
 * nearest neighbor replacement
-* analagous to free associative thinking
+* analagous to associative free-
 === Concerns with my approaches ===

@@ Line 67: / Line 67: @@
 === semantic gaussian blur ===
 * nearest neighbor replacement
 === Concerns with my approaches ===

@@ Line 49: / Line 49: @@
 == Outline ==
 === Text as Best Index ===
 Background/Motivation
 * online culture produces massive, language-annotated media datasets, (e-mails, twitter, text message, any direct messaging), and (video, audio, photos)
 * Text as best index
 * Computational NLP as tool.
 === What will the program do? ===
 * Speculative exploration (in the realm of ideas) ... grow something beyond its bounds. (Diagram 1)  ideas ?= language.
 * retrieval (humans do that).  search engines.  key-phrase.  (semantically) related search.
@@ Line 60: / Line 64: @@
 * ordering/sequencing.  (the production of cinematic experience?) ruminatory... wandering... associative": "ocean"->"sky"->"blue"->"red"->"nail polish"->
 * art object as parameterizable object, template: <title><ostensible subject><dimensions><medium><material>
 === Concerns with my approaches ===
 * ...but randomness is not good enough! don't remove the human from the loop, HI remains key criteria/filter. when do we like randomness (what point is made)? when do we not?
 * ...is it more interesting with intent? giving a system intent AI/ugh. If not intent, how about peroccupations/fixations.
 === Megahal Grandmommy ===
 === Language Brain ===
 == References ==

@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 site for intervention in the creative process, this paper frames the problem of imagination and choice in
 studio practice as a series of operations on sets of data (ideas, images, and materials) represented in the
-space of language. This choice of representation is drawn from the idea of indexical language, as a
+space of language. This choice of representation is drawn from the idea of indexical language, as an
-solution to the problem of representing materially diverse assets in a common space—in this case a
+approach to the problem of representing materially diverse assets in a common space—in this case a
 multi-dimensional vector space as described in Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Computational
-Linguistics (CL) literature.  Using tools from the ﬁelds of NLP and CL, speciﬁcally vector representations
+Linguistics (CL) literature.  Using tools from those fields, speciﬁcally vector representations
 and relatedness operations, I describe and implement a language processing system, applying it to the
 domains of video composition and an art-idea machine, creating formulae for studio art objects.  Less

← Older revision	Revision as of 16:35, 3 August 2009
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:23, 3 August 2009
Line 49:		Line 49:

	== Outline ==		== Outline ==
		+	* Background/Motivation
		+	** online culture produces massive, language-annotated personal media datasets
		+	*** some of which is exclusively text (e-mails, twitter, text message, any direct messaging)
		+	*** some of which are language-annotated rich media (video, audio, photos)
		+	** Text as best index
		+	** Computational NLP.
		+
		+	* What will the program do?
		+	* Speculative exploration (in the realm of ideas) ... grow something beyond its bounds
		+	** ideas ?= language
		+	** (Diagram 1)
		+	* retriveal (humans do that)
		+	** access/retrieval
		+	** search engines. key-phrase. (semantically) related search.
		+	* summary
		+	** key terms
		+	** key phrases (of the form "VERB to VERB", "NOUN modifier", "modifier NOUN", etc.)
		+	** Information Retrieval (IR) problem
		+	* ordering logic
		+	** ruminatory... wandering... associative
		+	** "ocean"->"sky"->"blue"->"red"->"nail polish"->
		+	* Art object as parameterizable object, template
		+	** Title
		+	** Ostensible subject
		+	** Dimensions
		+	** Medium
		+	** Material
		+	* Conceptual Concerns:
		+	** ...but randomness is not good enough!
		+	*** don't remove the human from the loop, subjective opinion remains key criteria/filter.
		+	*** when do we like randomness? (what point is made in those situations)
		+	*** when do we not?
		+	** ...is it more interesting with intent?
		+	*** maybe not intent, how about fixations.
		+
		+	* Previous Work
		+	== References ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:11, 3 August 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Not_Robert: Collaboration and Co-production in Language Systems	+
		+	== Not_Robert: Collaboration and Co-production in Language Systems ==
	DAC 2009, Theme: Cognition and creativity		DAC 2009, Theme: Cognition and creativity

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-== Theme: Cognition and creativity ==
+Not_Robert: Collaboration and Co-production in Language Systems
+DAC 2009, Theme: Cognition and creativity
 == Abstract ==