Difference between revisions of "Art And The Brain"
(Created page with "Project for DXARTS 490 AU13 - Art and The Brain http://wiki.dxarts.washington.edu/groups/general/wiki/cae56/DXARTS_490__Art_and_the_Brain__Fall_2013.html = feedback loops = h...") |
(→feedback loops) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
= feedback loops = | = feedback loops = | ||
http://phenomenologyftw.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/saussure.gif | http://phenomenologyftw.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/saussure.gif | ||
− | |||
+ | http://www.terrapapers.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Wernicke-5.jpg | ||
+ | *sharpen the loop, target. | ||
+ | =objects as utilities of the mind= | ||
= ideas = | = ideas = |
Revision as of 21:58, 27 October 2013
Project for DXARTS 490 AU13 - Art and The Brain http://wiki.dxarts.washington.edu/groups/general/wiki/cae56/DXARTS_490__Art_and_the_Brain__Fall_2013.html
feedback loops
- sharpen the loop, target.
objects as utilities of the mind
ideas
boundaries between the internal and the external. feedback loops (art machine), cognitive. perceptual (Lucier, etc.)
access to the ineffable, numinous (thought, spirit, things that can’t be articulated) or a better interface establishing other ways, other paths, other circuits.
goal is new thought, perspective. cognitive feedback loop.
encounter with unmediated children’s speech. reenacting children’s drawings (reemobdiment, closeness through kinesthetic experience) perhaps some child, there, moved their hand in a similar way in making the drawing.
end of life: alzheimer’s chatbot. beginning of life: searle’s room. pre-linguistic communication, poetics.
something with a longer arc.
krapp’s last tape. looping triple structure.
at the scale of the individual, what experimental feedback loops are possible?
training models on fMRI machine. cognition in the wild. Hutchins.
Nervous systems do not form representations of the world, they can only form representations of interactions with the world.[3] The emphasis on finding and describing "knowledge structures" that are somewhere "inside" the individual encourages us to overlook the fact that human cognition is always situated in a complex sociocultural world and cannot be unaffected by it.
—Hutchins, 1995 p. xiii